-The Thing- [Revival]

The Thing is amongst us.

Who is online?

In total there is 1 user online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 1 Guest


[ View the whole list ]

Most users ever online was 28 on Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:33 pm

Latest topics

» Important Announcement
Tue Jun 05, 2018 2:44 pm by Vicboy

» The Thing Updated Discussion
Mon May 07, 2018 8:48 am by Vicboy

» YouTube
Mon Jul 17, 2017 9:05 am by Datasick

» Project Showcase?
Mon Jul 17, 2017 9:00 am by Datasick

» Photography
Mon Jul 17, 2017 8:52 am by Datasick

» Wandering Critters to serve as food for the Thing.
Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:06 am by Probe

» Major Updates?
Sun Jul 09, 2017 10:40 pm by Durzan

» Release 0.281 to 0.286 [Overdue Update]
Thu Jun 01, 2017 1:28 pm by Durzan

    New Rating System



    Posts : 1
    Forum Points (FP) : 3
    Forum Rating (FR) : 0
    Join date : 2014-12-13
    Age : 19
    Location : Massachusetts

    New Rating System

    Post by Chronometer on Sat Dec 13, 2014 10:19 am

    Basically, the rating system sucks. The majority of your players aren't forgiving.
    Either you get 1 or 2 if you die as thing or you get 5 if you kill everybody.
    You should just say 'good' or 'bad', and not bother with having a complicated system. Just a thought.
    Game Moderator
    Game Moderator

    Posts : 432
    Forum Points (FP) : 977
    Forum Rating (FR) : 12
    Join date : 2014-12-12
    Location : Everywhere

    Re: New Rating System

    Post by Datasick on Sat Dec 13, 2014 10:59 am

    Yeh, Sportsmanship is lacking kinda, but it still going to be the same result if you were to vote good or bad.

    Community YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_bn8T_fTG7FWYnPXyn7foQ/videos

    Submit Footage to thethingrevivalvideos@gmail.com (Upload to Google Drive, Mediafire, etc. and then send that file link)

    Imgur http://datademon.imgur.com/

    Posts : 472
    Forum Points (FP) : 1243
    Forum Rating (FR) : 24
    Join date : 2014-11-27

    Re: New Rating System

    Post by Probe on Sat Dec 13, 2014 11:24 am

    I understand your intentions, but in reality the change wouldn't affect much. The way you said it, having it be either 5 or 1 with no other options is the same thing as a good or bad system. However, this system allows for variation and a more clear perspective of just how good a player is. Regardless, if you have a higher thing rating, then people can expect you are good. If you have a low one, people expect you to be bad. Its very black and white while still allowing players to give a "medium" rating using 3 or an in between stance on things using 2 and 4.

    In summary, this wouldn't change anything and would make it harder to distinguish good players from amazing players.

    Current Development: The Flesh Update


    Sponsored content

    Re: New Rating System

    Post by Sponsored content

      Current date/time is Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:21 pm